From Partially Examined Life: ‘John Searle Interview of Perception: Part One‘
Direct, naive realism requires some explanation of consciousness and a theory of perception:
‘We interview John about Seeing Things as They Are: A Theory of Perception (2015). What is perception? Searle says that it’s not a matter of seeing a representation, which is then somehow related to things in the real world. We see the actual objects, with no mediation. But then how can there be illusions?
Well, we see things under an aspect: a presentation of the thing. And that presentation presents itself as caused by just that thing that the perception is of. If these “conditions of satisfaction” (i.e., that the perception is actually caused by that thing) are not met, then we have a case of illusion: we thought we were perceiving that thing, but we really weren’t. Simple! Right? Searle lays out his theory for us and amusingly dismisses much of the history of philosophy.’
Related On This Site: Via A Reader-‘John Searle On The Philosophy Of Language’
From The Stanford Encyclopedia Of Philosophy: Charles Sanders Peirce
Some Sunday Quotations: (On) Kant, Locke, and Pierce
Via Youtube: (1 of 3) Kant, Chomsky and the Problem of Knowledge